Skip to content
⌘ K

Power shortages will delay more US AI data-center capacity than chip shortages through 2028.

The claim is directionally supported with medium conviction: power availability appears more likely to be the dominant constraint on US deployment through 2028, because utility-power lead times span years and analysts identify power as the main US bottleneck. However, the conclusion is not definitive: HBM and advanced packaging are documented binding constraints through at least 2027, and public evidence does not provide a clean apples-to-apples attribution of US capacity delays to power versus chips.

Read full analysis

Assessment

The evidence supports the claim more strongly for US data-center deployment than for global AI capacity, but not strongly enough for high conviction. The key distinction is between a chip being manufactured and a US facility being able to bring that chip online.

Why power appears more likely to dominate US delays

Morgan Stanley identifies power availability as the main current bottleneck to US data-center development. It also argues that, if US power is insufficient, globally demanded chips may be deployed in regions with excess power after a one-to-two-year delay. [6] This is directly aligned with the claim: power scarcity can delay or redirect US capacity even when the underlying chips exist.

TD Securities reports that its channel checks found utility-power procurement lead times of 2.5–7 years across 22 US markets. Its electricity-runway analysis forecasts reliability-rated power shortfalls in Northern Virginia in winter 2027 and New Albany, Ohio, in summer 2028. [7] Those lead times overlap the requested horizon and are structurally difficult to solve through short-term equipment purchases alone.

The deployment bottleneck is also visible in current industry reporting. A September 2026 report says Nvidia views power availability as a key barrier to getting AI server chips online as soon as they ship. [4] That is important because it describes a failure point after chip shipment: available hardware can remain unused if the data-center site lacks power.

Goldman Sachs forecasts that only about 50%–60% of data-center capacity scheduled for the next one to two years will come online on time amid delays and cancellations. [3] This does not attribute all slippage to power, so it should not be read as a power-only estimate. It does, however, indicate that a large share of the near-term buildout is exposed to execution constraints during the period leading into 2028.

EPRI's 2026 scenarios project US data centers will consume 9%–17% of national electricity by 2030, compared with 4%–5% today. [2] This is a demand projection rather than a direct delay estimate, but it indicates the scale of the power-system expansion required if the buildout proceeds.

Why chip shortages remain a serious counterargument

The IEA reports that high-end chip packaging constrained production in 2025 and that global high-end memory production became a binding constraint on AI-server production in the second half of 2025 and the beginning of 2026. [1] It reports that memory prices rose by an order of magnitude between late 2024 and early 2026 while inventory fell from almost four months to around three weeks. [1]

The IEA expects the AI-memory shortage to last at least until late 2027 and says current HBM production can support a maximum of around 25 GW of AI-ready servers per year through 2027. [1] This is a material chip-side ceiling that could delay or cap AI-server deployment independently of grid availability.

A separate manufacturing-industry analysis projects that 30%–50% of planned 2026 data-center capacity could slip to 2028. [5] This is a meaningful challenge to the thesis, but it is a projection rather than an observed outcome and does not provide a clean US-wide decomposition between chip shortages, power, permitting, financing, or other causes.

Bottom line for the 2028 horizon

On the available evidence, power is the more persuasive explanation for delays to US site commissioning and utilization, while chips remain a comparable constraint on the amount of AI-server hardware that can be produced. The claim should therefore be treated as directionally supported but conditional, not as an established quantitative fact. The main unresolved issue is attribution: public sources identify both bottlenecks but do not yet show, across the same US project sample, which one causes more delayed megawatts by 2028.

Conviction
Medium
Horizon
2–5y
Status
Active
Evidence
7 Entries
Last revised
September 22, 2026

Conviction

Medium

The evidence gives the claim a medium level of support. Power is identified as the main US data-center development bottleneck, utility-power lead times are measured in years, and contemporary reporting describes chips waiting for power even after shipment. The strongest caveat is that HBM and advanced packaging are also documented binding constraints through at least 2027, while public sources do not provide a clean US capacity-delay attribution showing that power causes more delays than chips on a like-for-like basis.

What would change this assessment
  • The assessment would strengthen if US projects in 2027–2028 increasingly report delivered AI chips waiting for energized capacity, while HBM and advanced-packaging supply expands enough that chip delivery is no longer cited as the binding constraint.

  • The assessment would weaken or overturn if project-level data through 2028 attributes a larger share of delayed US AI capacity to GPU, HBM, or advanced-packaging shortages than to utility interconnection, transmission, generation, or site-power delays.

  • The assessment would weaken if Northern Virginia, New Albany, and other constrained markets add sufficient reliable power on schedule and utility procurement lead times fall materially below the reported 2.5–7 year range.

  • The assessment would strengthen if US capacity is demonstrably relocated abroad because chips are available but US sites cannot obtain power within the planned commissioning window.

Evidence balance

4 Supporting1 Mixed2 Challenges

Pillars

Pillars for

Pillars against

Timeline of Articles

Discussion
SupportingF1F2
September 20, 2026

How Nvidia Is Trying to Solve the Data Center Power Bottleneck

The article reports Nvidia viewing power availability as a key barrier to getting AI server chips online as soon as they ship, implying that delivered chips can remain idle when facilities lack power. This is direct, contemporary evidence for power being a deployment bottleneck, although it does not provide a complete quantitative comparison with chip shortages.

SupportingF2
May 20, 2026

US Data Center Power Demand Projected to Double by 2027

Goldman Sachs forecasts that only about 50%–60% of data-center capacity scheduled over the next one to two years will come online on time amid delays and cancellations. The forecast does not attribute every delay to power, but it shows substantial execution risk during the period leading into 2028 and is consistent with power and grid constraints being a major limiting factor.

ChallengesA2
April 20, 2026

The great data center delay: Why your AI chips are stuck in the queue

This industry analysis projects that 30%–50% of planned 2026 data-center capacity could slip to 2028. It provides a contrary chip-scarcity-related capacity-delay scenario, but the cited finding is a projection and does not directly measure whether chip shortages or power shortages account for the larger share of US delays.

ChallengesA1
April 16, 2026

Key Questions on Energy and AI

The IEA reports that high-end chip packaging constrained production in 2025 and that high-end memory became a binding constraint on AI-server production in late 2025 and early 2026. It expects the AI-memory shortage to last at least until late 2027, with current HBM production supporting at most around 25 GW of AI-ready servers annually through 2027. This materially qualifies the claim: chip shortages are a serious competing bottleneck, even if the source does not quantify their relative impact on US capacity versus power constraints.

MixedF1
February 2026

Powering Intelligence 2026 - EPRI

EPRI projects US data centers will consume 9%–17% of national electricity by 2030, up from 4%–5% today. This is a demand forecast rather than a direct delay attribution, but it supports the claim's premise that power-system requirements will grow sharply; it does not establish that power will cause more capacity delays than chips.

SupportingF1F2
June 20, 2024

Data Centers Part II: Power Constraints – The Path Forward

TD Securities reports utility-power procurement lead times of 2.5–7 years across 22 US markets and projects reliability-rated power shortfalls in Northern Virginia in winter 2027 and New Albany, Ohio, in summer 2028. These findings directly support the expectation that grid availability can delay US capacity over the requested horizon, though they are analyst estimates rather than observed nationwide outages.

SupportingF1F3
Date unavailable

MS_Print Design_North America Insight English

Morgan Stanley identifies power availability as the main current bottleneck to US data-center development and argues that, if US power is unavailable, chips may instead be deployed in other regions after a one-to-two-year delay. This directly supports the thesis for US capacity, while also qualifying it: the constraint may shift deployment geographically rather than eliminate global chip utilization.

Comments

LatestPopular
Write a comment
Loading comments…

Request a Thesis

Tell us what you’d like Roadstar to investigate.

New question

What would you like to know?

Context guides the research and is not shown on the finished page.