By the end of the July 8–December 30 window, the ten-year Treasury yield had risen 108 basis points and bank ETF KBE had returned 44.57%, with distributions reinvested.
1
This selected window shows that banks can benefit when rising yields accompany reflation; it does not establish a general rule.
Across January 3–October 24, the ten-year Treasury yield rose 262 basis points, while KBE returned −14.71% and energy ETF XLE returned +57.46%, with distributions reinvested.
Chubb reports underwriting profit alongside investment income
The ten-year nominal Treasury yield stood at 5.17%. Since January 2 it had risen 98 basis points, compared with an 89-basis-point rise in the ten-year real yield and a 134-basis-point rise in the two-year nominal yield.
By Intermission· 2,754 words
What are the best U.S. investments in an environment of rising long-term interest rates?
A rising-yield window favored banks
[12][13][16]By the end of the July 8–December 30 window, the ten-year Treasury yield had risen 108 basis points and bank ETF KBE had returned 44.57%, with distributions reinvested.
This selected window shows that banks can benefit when rising yields accompany reflation; it does not establish a general rule.
A different rising-yield window hurt banks
[14][15][10]Across January 3–October 24, the ten-year Treasury yield rose 262 basis points, while KBE returned −14.71% and energy ETF XLE returned +57.46%, with distributions reinvested.
Chubb reports underwriting profit alongside investment income
[9]Chubb reported a second-quarter P&C combined ratio of 83.8% and pretax investment income of $1.76 billion, up 12.3% year over year.
Progressive reports a weaker underwriting margin
[26]Progressive reported an August combined ratio of 89.3%, up 6.2 points from August 2025.
Treasury yields show a broad rise, not just a long-end move
[19][20][21][22]The ten-year nominal Treasury yield stood at 5.17%. Since January 2 it had risen 98 basis points, compared with an 89-basis-point rise in the ten-year real yield and a 134-basis-point rise in the two-year nominal yield.
Sources
Comments